Compare AI models: Qwen3.8 Max vs Ling 3.1 Flash
- Qwen3.8 MaxAlibaba
- Ling 3.1 FlashinclusionAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.8 Max | 88/100 | 100/100 | 27/100 | 81/100 | 67/100 | 91/100 |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 63/100 | 63/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
262K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video, Pdf
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$2.00/ 1M
$0.30/ 1M
Output
$6.00/ 1M
$0.90/ 1M
Cached input
$0.25/ 1M
$0.06/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
119K
41K
Completed sessions
481,506
825,434
Token share
0.03%
0.02%
Tokens
261B+42%
252B+100%
AUG 25OCT 19
AUG 25OCT 19
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
45.4%6.1K user-weeks
Pending