Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GPT-3.5-turbo
- DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
- GPT-3.5-turboOpenAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 100/100 | 100/100 | 69/100 | 81/100 | 33/100 | 92/100 |
| GPT-3.5-turbo | 0/100 — Reasoning not supported | 6/100 | 51/100 | 10/100 | 0/100 | 0/100 — Tool calling not supported |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
16K
Reasoning
True
False
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.15/ 1M
$0.50/ 1M
Output
$0.60/ 1M
$1.50/ 1M
Cached input
$0.003/ 1M
Unknown
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
2.7M
0
Completed sessions
58,473,008
3
Token share
27.1%
0%
Tokens
279T+100%
00%
AUG 25OCT 19
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
68.5%317K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeGPT-3.5-turbo vs Jamba MiniGPT-3.5-turbo·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba LargeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonGPT-3.5-turbo vs Jamba LargeGPT-3.5-turbo·Jamba Large