GitHub[208K]Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiMo-V2-Pro

  1. DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
  2. MiMo-V2-ProXiaomiHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash100/100100/10069/10081/10033/10092/100
MiMo-V2-Pro50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder61/10092/1000/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.15/ 1M
$0.43/ 1M
Output
$0.60/ 1M
$0.87/ 1M
Cached input
$0.003/ 1M
$0.0036/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
2.7M
4.6K
Completed sessions
58,473,008
8,339
Token share
27.1%
0%
Tokens
279T+100%
00%
AUG 25OCT 19
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
68.5%317K user-weeks
Pending

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.