GitHub[208K]Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

  1. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpDeepSeek
  2. MiMo-V2.6-ProXiaomiHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp25/10075/10053/10081/10033/1000/100
MiMo-V2.6-Pro44/100100/10061/10092/10067/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text, Image, Audio, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.44/ 1M
$0.43/ 1M
Output
$1.32/ 1M
$0.87/ 1M
Cached input
$0.01/ 1M
$0.0036/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
335K
103K
Completed sessions
1,187,796
492,445
Token share
0.83%
0.19%
Tokens
8.6T+668%
1.9T+100%
AUG 25OCT 19
AUG 25OCT 19
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
62.9%26K user-weeks
66.9%4K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.