Compare AI models: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BNVIDIAHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
MiMo-V2.6-ProXiaomiHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B	0/100	34/100	83/100	63/100	0/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
MiMo-V2.6-Pro	44/100	100/100	61/100	92/100	67/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark

Overview

Author

NVIDIA

Xiaomi

Context length

262K

Reasoning

True

Input modalities

Text

Text, Image, Audio, Video

Output modalities

Text

Providers

NVIDIA

Xiaomi

Pricing

Input

$0.05/ 1M

$0.43/ 1M

Output

$0.20/ 1M

$0.87/ 1M

Cached input

$0.01/ 1M

$0.0036/ 1M

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

261K

103K

Completed sessions

7,043,918

492,445

Token share

0.43%

0.19%

Tokens

4.4T+202%

1.9T+100%

AUG 25OCT 19

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

Pending

66.9%4K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.

Nearby alternativeNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Jamba MiniNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BJamba Mini Nearby alternativeMiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Jamba MiniMiMo-V2.6-ProJamba Mini Related comparisonNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Jamba LargeNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BJamba Large Related comparisonMiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Jamba LargeMiMo-V2.6-ProJamba Large